The head of headlining

With media outlets ever struggling to create a strong captivating headline story. This has even gotten to the point journalists have delved into the ethical grey (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8634176/Phone-hacking-timeline-of-a-scandal.html) to obtain an eye catching headline.  

Though it's on a smaller scale local news outlets also have the problem. Chris Frost writes on the nature of information people want to have in their news their are two types:

1. This kind of news tells us about our surroundings and environment that we need to survive. An example of this would be (http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2012/01/cctv-appeal-over-sexual-assault-in-lincoln/) - though it may pertain strictly to Maslows hierarchy of needs this still informs people of Lincoln about the dangers on the streets. This kind of news tends to be breaking and what could be considered as 'hard' news, as demonstrated from the link above hard stories pertain to a serious subject.

2. This kind of news is about ourselves and, by extension, our fellow human beings. These kinds of stories are what could be considered on some occasions to be 'soft' news stories like for example the story of Karl Mcartney growing a goatee for the Movember event (http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2011/12/lincoln-mp-grows-a-goatee-for-charity/ ) , this is soft as it does not directly relate to a serious event. However the story of a mother setting up a charity in honour of her childs death has the human element but relates to a very serious subject (http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2011/12/my-babys-disorder-was-incompatible-with-life/ ).

To apply this to one of my stories and why this was immediately placed in an area of central visual impact (http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2012/01/fewer-gift-pets-abandoned-in-lincoln/ ). The story could be considered as maybe a hybrid soft news story of point 1. Because the story concerns itself with the surroundings of the city (the animal population). Though the subject is serious it's not considered as serious as the story used in point 1 and fortunately my findings for the RSPCA story were more optimistic then those the CCTV story. Another reason the story was considered to be headline news could be attributed to the photo since it's unique and pertains to something which conotates 'cuteness' and again according to Roger De-Bank it includes someone doing something interesting.

The truth in interviewing

This week we've examined the ethics of interviewing. That's right another subject that's loaded full or moral questions.

As part of demonstration of the difficulties we face with interviewing Alex played us an interview with the lead singer of 3 foot ninja who name is Jordan and had difficulty putting across some sound byte suitable responses to his questions. He came off as uninformed and mumbled and stumbled throughout the interview.

Alex then played us the edited shorter version of the interview which then made Jordan sound like he just had a poor connection.

Three points to consider when editing an interview are:
1. Is the interview going to embarrass anyone ?- Has the interviewee slipped and maybe they deserve some kind of gate keeping to avoid unnecessary ridicule. An example of when this could have been avoided but because it was live was David Blaine interview with Eamon Holmes on GMTV after one of his recent stunts. He came off as dazed and confused and thus Holmes further probing made his come of as very dim witted.
2. A total P/R failure ? Does the interview come off as a complete P/R disaster and could be damaging to them or the station ?  An example of this could be Lady GaGa's interview with Johnathan Ross in which she was unclear and difficult when she asked about the nature of her lyrics.
3. Right person ? Is the interviewee even the right person to be interviewing, Jordan displayed that maybe he wasn't the most vital part of the band as he was unable to answer a lot of questions fully referring to another band member who seems to hold all the answers.

However sometimes these points have to over ridden in the public interest. An example could be the Richard Nixon and David Frosts interview which effectively destroyed the public image of Richard Nixon and exposed his illicit activities while he was President. Breaking it down with the three point system:
1. The interview was highly embarrassing for Nixon who arranged the interview and didn't expect such a probing nature from Frost. However this was about exposing his corrupt nature and failures in office.
2. Nixon had planned for this to be a P/R event which would sway public opinion in favour but Frost decided to stick to his ethical code and fairly conduct the interview.
3. Nixon was the right person to interview in a sense, however one of his subordinates may have more details on how the Watergate scandal was implemented. Though in a sense he was the architect of the scandal however secondary interviews could have cemented his point.

To conclude the nature of editing is influenced by the soft or hard news status of the interview. Maybe it doesn't matter that Jordans interview was cut down to remove some of the more dazed answers but it still put across the point he's possibly not the best interviewee. On the case of Nixon editing it was less of a finer tool helps to put across the sheer nature of the interviewee and expose in a sense the completely uncensored truth.

Again maybe the P/R nature of stations coming in again, the desire not to incur the wrath of a popular interviewee could reduce ratings of they can never get that person again due to poor interview. The fact is very few interviews are displayed to portray someone in a negative spotlight, people like Chirs Brown however displays very poor media training and allows his anger to dictate his behaviour adding to his already poor image.

The return post

So welcome back to the intrepid adventures I like to document on my blog (a slightly dated form of blog introduction but it just seems polite)

Today in our lecture Alex revealed the best way to enhance our marks was to dedicate sometime of our placement blogs (150 to 200 words) to critiquing our work. So the subjects for today will be an overall look at my performance in my blog so far.

So far the feedback from editor is that the nature of my ideas are strong subjects for features especially the ice cream story (which has yet to be published but will be in my portfolio), the type of stories my editor expects and I seem to be excelling at are off-diary stories. A definition to this is mentioned by Christ Frost 'These require the reporter to be more creative, thinking up ways to track down stories that are not going to be notified to newsdesk.'. When looking at the ice cream story I feel I've been creative enough to come up with a story no other outlet has covered. Though what has let me down for this story is not being able to find any other seasonal businesses to prevent the story from feeling like a promotion rather a then a look into the cities seasonal economy.

When looking further into what I could improve comes down to collating interviewee details. When it comes to interviewing I have found that in haste I have forgotten to obtain full names of subjects and various bio graphical information. According to Chris Frost 'interviewing allows you to find out the who, what, when where, why and how of the story', maybe with a little more detailed research into my subject could give my these details like correct spell, full name and job title etc. However for vox popping stories like I've recently done (but no currently published) in which I took to the streets of Lincoln and ask people did they feel the actions of the council are helping them feel involved in the 2012 Olympics I found that the ideas of Chris Frost explain clearly why I felt embarrassed and novice to ask for spelling clarifications of in haste forget to collate all details especially for one gentlemen who I forget to ask how his first name was spelt and what his last name was. What Frost said was 'The trite old phrase, 'There's never a second chance to make a first impression' is only annoying because it's true.'

Also maybe more persuasion is needed. Especially when it came to my interview with local author Hobb Whittons (http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2011/06/blue-fire-burning-for-local-author/), the name is clearly a pen name and did not want to reveal his true identity. however conventionally editors like Andrew David recommend obtaining their name though respecting their wishes for it not be published to avoid any legal difficulties which may arise. This is even professionally recommended by the NUJ, point 7 of their code of conduct says- 'Protect the identidy of sources who supply information in confidence in the course of his/her work', though this is not on the level of whistle blowing it's still ethical to respect their wishes.

To ensure I do not continue to make these mistakes I will try to do more detailed research for pre-arranged interviews and ensure one of the first questions I ask are strictly biographical.

Now onto another subject I want to look a the unconventional skill set journalists may require.

Looking at the example of my work colleagues I am aware they quite up to date with modern technological trends and do freelance works for technology outlets thus they have another employable skill set on top of their journalism  and various other subjects degrees. Since my editor also has to deal with the business side of the website gives him another skill set.

This has now proposed the idea that maybe I should start cultivating a collection of unconventional but useful skills to help in my career. This could also lead me into a specialist subject though I will need to find a subject as Angela Rippon suggests 'That you know everything about', in a guest talk she described an encounter with a student who wanted to specialise in the entertainment industry but mentioned how they had limited knowledge of the later part of the 20th century something she believed to have limited their understanding as they did not know about what some people considered the best dancers of all time.

For skills however I believe my demonstration of photo manipulation has proven useful when I was on my BBC placement I was able to help a producer rotate an image when she was struggling to perform the task herself.

To conclude I need a specialist subject and skills. I think I will start to understand these slowly if I try to cover subjects which interest and try to experiment with different story treatments.